Dave Burris Declares the Verdicts Are In

Yesterday, Dave Burris said I was too quick to complain that he's already blaming Barack Obama for our economic troubles. I accepted his explanation that his post on the wholesale inflation numbers for January reflected his criticism of the Federal Reserve Bank, and not of Obama.
All well and good, but where would I possibly get the impression that Dave is itching to blame Obama for our dismal economic conditions after one month on the job? Perhaps from this post:

First Month Verdicts In
Feb 21st, 2009 by Dave Burris
The Obama administration has reached the one-month marker, and a few folks have weighed in on the first 30 days.
Stock Market Gives Obama’s First Month an F

I can think of a few reasons why stock prices are falling: We're in the middle of the worst economic crisis of our lifetime; businesses are reporting dismal earnings, 600,000 workers are losing their jobs every month, our financial system is in failure mode, and credit is still hard to come by.
Clearly these economic troubles are were not set in motion in the last month.
More than anything else, a stock price reflects the underlying value of the company. Maybe, just maybe, stock prices are down because businesses are in terrible shape. Yet Dave Burris impatiently points out that Barack Obama hasn't fixed it all yet, and links to an opinion piece giving him an F.
Here's some of what I wrote yesterday in the post Dave objected to:

I imagine Republicans like Burris will continue to criticize Obama’s economic policies over the next 47 months. That’s what opposition parties do. But perhaps he could try a little harder to give his arguments the ring of plausibility.

Blaming Obama's economic policies for the falling stock market this early in his term is barely plausible. Perhaps Dave could try a little harder with his arguments.